<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Personnel Files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The latest developments in the law of the workplace, from the employment and labor lawyers at Zashin &#38; Rich Co., L.P.A.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='zrhr.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="The Personnel Files" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://zrhr.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>California Supreme Court: Employers Need Not &#8220;Police&#8221; Meal Breaks To Ensure They Are Taken</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/california-supreme-court-employers-need-not-police-meal-breaks-to-ensure-they-are-taken/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/california-supreme-court-employers-need-not-police-meal-breaks-to-ensure-they-are-taken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage & Hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yum.  If it&#8217;s meal time, then your employees &#8211; at least those willing to toss their artery-clogging consciences to the wind &#8211; may very well want to chow down on something like the above. And, at least in California, it &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/california-supreme-court-employers-need-not-police-meal-breaks-to-ensure-they-are-taken/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722507&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/california-supreme-court-employers-need-not-police-meal-breaks-to-ensure-they-are-taken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/2012-001.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Burger and Fries</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit: You Won&#8217;t Violate CFAA By Taking the Time to Read This Post</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/9th-circuit-you-wont-violate-cfaa-by-taking-the-time-to-read-this-post/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/9th-circuit-you-wont-violate-cfaa-by-taking-the-time-to-read-this-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Fraud and Abuse Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exceeds Authorized Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) has a pretty scary provision in it: Whoever &#8230; intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains &#8230; information from a protected computer &#8230; shall be punished as provided &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/9th-circuit-you-wont-violate-cfaa-by-taking-the-time-to-read-this-post/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722499&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/9th-circuit-you-wont-violate-cfaa-by-taking-the-time-to-read-this-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fun with ERISA: The Perils of Multiemployer Pension Plans</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/fun-with-erisa-the-perils-of-multiemployer-pension-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/fun-with-erisa-the-perils-of-multiemployer-pension-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indemnification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withdrawal Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever heard of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (MPPAA)? MPPAA deals with pension plans that cover multiple companies (typically in the union context), and what happens when one of those companies decides to leave the plan. If &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/fun-with-erisa-the-perils-of-multiemployer-pension-plans/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722496&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/fun-with-erisa-the-perils-of-multiemployer-pension-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Court Acted Properly in Not Aggregating Plaintiffs&#8217; Harassment Evidence</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/6th-circuit-court-acted-properly-in-not-aggregating-plaintiffs-harassment-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/6th-circuit-court-acted-properly-in-not-aggregating-plaintiffs-harassment-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostile Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racial Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a bunch of folks all band together and sue their common employer, each bringing individual harassment claims, should the court consider their evidence in aggregate when resolving the case, regardless of the extent to which each individual plaintiff was &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/6th-circuit-court-acted-properly-in-not-aggregating-plaintiffs-harassment-evidence/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722490&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/6th-circuit-court-acted-properly-in-not-aggregating-plaintiffs-harassment-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/hand.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Join Hands</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Circuit: Cat&#8217;s Paw Theory Is a &#8220;Judicial Attractive Nuisance&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/7th-circuit-cats-paw-theory-is-a-judicial-attractive-nuisance/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/7th-circuit-cats-paw-theory-is-a-judicial-attractive-nuisance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cat's Paw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cat's paw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you have heard that there is this theory of employment liability floating around called &#8220;cat&#8217;s paw&#8221; . Maybe you have even heard that there&#8217;s a recent U.S. Supreme Court case discussing cat&#8217;s paw liability. (there is: Staub v. Proctor &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/7th-circuit-cats-paw-theory-is-a-judicial-attractive-nuisance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722486&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/7th-circuit-cats-paw-theory-is-a-judicial-attractive-nuisance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/catspaw.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Cat&#039;s Paw</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Court: No Immediate Appeal from Denial of Preliminary Injunction Against Unfair Competition</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Procedures and Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion for preliminary injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you sue a bunch of former sales employees for absconding with customer information and violating non-solicitation agreements, and you ask a judge to issue a &#8220;preliminary injunction&#8221; to stop those former employees in their tracks while your lawsuit is &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722482&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/163942wfgg6yvcz.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Question Mark</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does &#8220;Manifest Disregard&#8221; Still Exist as a Grounds for Vacating an Arbitrator&#8217;s Award?</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manifest Disregard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For as long as I can remember, courts have entertain arguments about whether or not to overturn an arbitrator&#8217;s award on the grounds the the arbitrator &#8220;manifestly disregarded&#8221; the law. Trouble is, there&#8217;s this statute out there called the Federal &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722478&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strolling Into Your Opponent&#8217;s &#8220;Electronically Stored Garden&#8221;: The Production of Hard Drives in Discovery</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Disks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy and confidentiality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally, I receive discovery requests from other lawyers who demand, as part of their initial discovery requests, that they be permitted to make &#8220;forensic&#8221; copies of my client&#8217;s computer hard drives, apparently so that they (or their experts) can examine the entire &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722466&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/6847647ltc7ulbs.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">magnifying</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Federal &#8220;Edge Act&#8221; Did Not Permit Removal of Ohio Wrongful Discharge Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Procedures and Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction and Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ordinarily, cases involving a court&#8217;s jurisdiction aren&#8217;t terribly exciting reading. Cases involving removal jurisdiction tend to be even less exciting.  And cases involving both removal jurisdiction and foreign currency transactions can&#8230; well., ZZzzZzzzzzz. But then I saw Sollitt v. KeyCorp., &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722453&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/5724499u72gvu1j.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Piggy Bank</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit: Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable Because Employer Reserved Right to Modify It</title>
		<link>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/</link>
		<comments>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several companies have mandatory arbitration programs, pursuant to which every employee must sign an agreement promising to submit every possible claim they might want to assert against the company to mandatory and binding arbitration. Much ink has been spilled in &#8230; <a href="http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=zrhr.wordpress.com&#038;blog=27488141&#038;post=10170722443&#038;subd=zrhr&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zrhr.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/52928h8fy8cpivs.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Handshake</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
